Your looking for memorized deck work, right?
Me too. but I had already learned how to memorize
a deck from the Nikola stack chapter at the end of Encyclopdedia of Card tricks.
I found
Aronson's stack on the internet and memorized it.
So I wanted "bound to please" to learn some
good mem deck work.
Problem is, there are some mem deck effects, but most are card tricks for
magicians... Quite simply, I find (right now) one of the most potent tricks with any mem deck is
simply have spec take a card, you glimpse any adjacent card to INSTANTLY tell him his card. For a
lay spec, its complete mastery of a "selection-location". He picks any card. You instantly name
it.
Was it Dai Vernon who said something like, the simpler an effect is to describe, the more
powerful it is? (e.g. Invisible Deck: A thought of card. Only one reversed. (Minds blown!))
.... this is NOT the case with what I'm seeing from Aronson's work. IN FACT he often
deliberately makes procedures MORE "muddy" to disguise the simpler true method. This is ONLY to
throw of knowledgeable cardicians.
A the end of one of the enclosed books, "A stack to
remember", is a bibiliography of mem-deck work". Perhaps any of these would be more interesting to
me.
Also, I feel somewhat underwhelmed by "shuffle-bored" for the same reasons mentioned above.
Is it really that earth-shattering to predict how many cards are face up in a face down deck?
Again, the procedure is too muddy.
This material will intrigue magicians that you perform
for, so get it if you want to wow your buddies at the magic club. But for a lay audience, stick
with more entertaining or direct effects.