Pros
A stunner of an effect
Excellent, excellent teaching
Extremely well thought
out/choreographed
Clearly refined from experience in the real world
Training video is
perfect in terms of time
Cons
Not for beginners/maybe for intermediates
Requires
gaffs/not impromptu
Can't be repeated for the same audience
Wardrobe considerations if
performed standing
Looking at the trailer for Nemesis, it was clear to me that Nick was
doing 'something,' but I still was totally fooled by the trick. That said, it's not like I'm the
most experienced or savvy magician and I missed a key component which is why I absolutely couldn't
back track the effect. The reactions were great and the price more than reasonable, so I went for
it.
I haven't received the trick yet, but have enough of what I might need to work thorough
the trick, so I've pretty much been able to practice this, albeit awkwardly.
Without
giving anything away, there are some wardrobe considerations that you will need if you are doing
this standing up. The deck is examinable before the trick. With a little follow up work, the deck
will be examinable afterwards as well. There are minimal sleights at work here, but that which is
employed is bold. Experienced magicians will not have a problem with this, but beginning and
intermediate magicians may not feel ready for this--you have been warned. That said, the way Nick
has choreographed the effect, the heat is off the magician when you do the dirty work. Strangely,
when he shows an example of where he should have been caught, he wasn't. Spectators are distracted
elsewhere, so if you are going to do this kind of move, this is the best way to do it. Given the
method, you could not repeat the effect for the same audience. (You probably shouldn't anyway...)
Suffice it to say that the combination of the sleight and the gaff is what really drives
the trick. The fact that you can optionally wring out the gaff at the end of the trick and have the
deck fully examinable, makes this virtually untraceable. That said, I totally agree with Nick:
unless you are doing this for magicians, no spectator will have any interest in examining the deck
afterwards.
The teaching 1 hour 46 minutes and is spot on. It is neither too long or too
short--it's just right. Nick covers the script, the choreography, and any sleights used. Nick
gives you multiple outs, multiple options for sleights used, extras that can be added in, and how to
end clean. There is also a bonus routine 'Nemesis at any number' in the end.
The major
criticism seems to be that there is 'nothing new here' or that 'you will be disappointed in the
method.' Yes, this is nothing new in terms of the tools or sleights used, but you'd be hard pressed
to put this thing together yourself and most magic we read or buy is some kind of rehashing of past
plots and methods. The key here is we are being taught a signature piece of magic by an expert
teacher, which is already worth the price of admission (which is wholly reasonable, by the way).
As to being disappointed in the method, I'm not sure why anyone would say that. Once you
know the 'secret' most effects seems simpler than they should be. They key is whether the effect
hits hard (this one does) and if it is doable for most of us in front of an audience (e.g. doesn't
require Ernest Earick/Octopus-Can-Palm level sleights). Sure, you are using known gaff principles
and sleights, but if I could have put this thing together, I'd be working for Penguin instead of
Nick and maybe I would also have a better head of hair... This is an excellent way to use well known
tools to get an incredible result. So I think--at least for most of us--it is more than worthwhile.
That said, I'm not sure whether I will use this. I think for for working magicians who do
a lot of gigging, traveling with a pack of gaffs and different card decks is a usual thing. This
trick is hard hitting and one of those things that would be a 'reputation maker.' For the amateur,
such as myself, who does tricks here or there for friends with borrowed decks, this is not something
that you'd use very often, as you'd have to think ahead to bring the gaff and it would need to match
the cards you are using. Then again, if I were doing a one off for friends and family at home, I
can see myself bringing this out because it is such a stunner. As a major side benefit for
intermediate magicians, you will learn a lot about constructing a magic effect and will also learn a
useful sleight that you may have been neglecting. It is more than worth the price for what I
learned so far, even if I never perform this trick.
Hats off to Nick Locapo for a great
routine and for incredible teaching. Recommended.
There is definitely a sleight of hand move involved here if you want to ring the gaff in and out.
If you start with the gaff in place, I suppose, there are what you might consider a minor 'secret moves' to get into position, but no real sleight of hand. (Some might quibble that any secret move is sleight of hand, but this is minor stuff that is totally undetectable to the spectator and is something I would consider procedural.)
All that said, the strength of the effect is really the fact that you can ring in the gaff. For me, this is what really makes it a real fooler. You can perform an entire set of card magic with the deck as usual. Your audience could examine the deck and it will appear completely normal. That ringing in of the gaff is sleight of hand and, for a beginner, a very bold move at that. Of course, the way Nick cleverly choreographs the trick, the heat is totally off you as you are doing the move. But it is a move nevertheless. If you want to end 'clean' you will have to ring out the gaff--another, similarly, bold move, but Nick will show you how/when to do this.
Again, the main reason your audience will be totally uninterested in examining the deck after the effect is because they have already seen, examined, even held the cards for prior effects. There is no reason for them to expect anything.
So--yeah--you could theoretically do the trick as a one off with the gaff in place from the start, but I don't think it would be as strong.
A long answer to a short question--I hope I covered it.
I just want to say I appreciate the thoroughness of this answer. I was on the fence about getting this trick because there are some sleights I can do moderately well, but some (like the Classic Pass) that I can just not pull off without it being super obvious. So this information really helps inform my decision. Hats off to you, jojoleb!