Since there are already so many great endorsements in the ad, I don't want to review the book so
much as respond to the review that has been anonymously posted. First, if you are going to trash
something, at least show some respect and use your name!
Anon, I think if you took the time
to really read Mysteries Anywhere, you would have gotten past the language issues and discovered the
gems within. And it would have become obvious that Pablo's ideas are far from half-baked nor is MA
anywhere near a rough draft.
I absolutely agree that MA should have been edited better.
However, that doesn't take away from the many great effects and ideas. It just makes for a little
more effort needed on the part of the reader. I do believe editing is important and that is the only
reason I'm not giving MA a 4 star review.
Along with excellent effects, the ideas Pablo
mentions almost as asides are priceless. Take another look at "I.D.S" to see what I mean for just
one example.
Anon, you should take the reviews, and who the reviewers are, seriously. To
accuse them of not even reading the material is insulting to their reputations and obviously
incorrect.
They not only read the book, they took the time to process the information
within and think through its implications and many possible applications. MA achieves what it sets
out to accomplish in providing you with strong effects you can perform anywhere.
I hope
you will take my words to heart and read Mysteries Anywhere again. If not, you will continue to miss
out by missing what is within.