To me it seems more of a guess than an effect. The explanation is straightforward, but since the
"effect" was not, for me, as strong as advertised, the explanation became somewhat inconsequential.
This is no criticism of Mr. Schlutz’ work, but simply a review based on my personal preference. If
you like a less abstract way to achieve an outcome, this is not for you. If you are daring and have
the self-confidence Mr. Schlutz obviously has, then you may find it more suited to your style.
Again, I believe that everyone's work should be celebrated; as it is an expression of his or her
dedication to something all of us love and enjoy. Therefore, my comments are not meant to criticize
or demean what is being offered. I base my evaluation solely on whether I would integrate this
effect into one of my routines. Personally, I would not due to the guess factor. For those who need
more predictability in the outcome, this is not for us. I'm sure others will enjoy the challenge and
find it to their liking. Thank you Mr. Schlutz for your presentation and for bringing Decon-2.0 to
us.