Eric Jones is one of the most prominent coin magicians in the planet, but in this particular
lecture, he showcases more than just coins. He showcases his philosophy, his approaches, and even
creative process. This lecture is one of the best lectures that I have observed in the past months.
From the format to the effects, to the audience, to even the host, this was one of the finest
lectures I have had the pleasure of viewing.
I, honestly, had been searching for Eric
Jone's material for months now, and I am glad that 3 of which were in the lecture. Peregrination,
Speedfly and Impossible Coin Across. These three effects alone is well worth the lecture. Eric Jones
explains each effect thoroughly and even offers insights and additional subtleties in each, which I
greatly appreciate. I don't really mind that Impossible Coin Across was the effect that fooled Penn
and Teller. It was heavily emphasized as such. All I saw was an elegant construction of moves and
strategic timings that make use of gimmicks. Eric proves that once you have played with a toy long
enough, and studied its features hard enough, you are able to use that knowledge to manipulate even
the spectator's perception of them. It's kinda confusing, but view the lecture and it will make
perfect sense. His selection of effects in this lecture was good. He has an organized set of effects
to present and explain, and he tackles each with precision. He, however, has the tendency to go
overboard with the explanations and starts branching alternatives from one effect to another. This
is not necessarily a bad thing because the audience can get more than what they expected to get.
I am not sure about the time constraints for this lecture, because, I downloaded the
lecture, and Speedfy performance was cut from the first phase directly into the last phase.I would
like to have seen the full performance of that effect. Other magicians might only care about the
method and explanations, but there are a few who would like to study an unedited performance.
The format is pretty direct and smooth. The first part of the lecture were the effects, and the
second part was an interview with Dan Harlan. It was pretty clean in execution and it felt very
professional and organized. I would love to attend an actual lecture just because the organization
was flawless. I really loved how the flow of the lecture went.
I also appreciate the
audience for this particular lecture. The audience was a mix of veteran magicians and younger
generations, and I think I stopped a couple of females as well. More importantly, each magician
interaction with the audience was very beneficial for any student. This is an example of a very
intelligent audience. They had asked all the right hard hitting questions in this lecture. They
would ask things overlooked or needed clarification. They would explore steps and concept thoroughly
urging Eric to explain further. They would ask these questions with novices in mind, or even with a
veteran in mind. I love these kinds of audience in magic lectures. They allow for so much input for
those who could not attend it personally.
I would like to also address "dead time" in the
lecture. I would like to stress that there is minimal dead time, and what dead time was present,
either Dan Harlan, or Eric Jones managed it. There are times wherein nothing happened, but Eric and
Dan gave some input to help fill in those times strategically. I appreciate that compared to
lectures wherein the magician, host or even the audience are shown in the camera with their eyes
open waiting for something to happen. For me, that is not appropriate for a downloaded version. Eric
is not seen pulling out his props from his bag, or scanning a laptop. He had things prepared, which
saves time, and whatever further preparations he needed was edited away.
I would also like
to address the host, Dan Harlan. I had been following some of his work, and he has a sort of vibe
that when he talks, you listen. And he has the ability to communicate that makes you understand
clearly what he means. His trailer in youtube was well done, and I never felt bored listening to him
talk for 5 minutes straight about Eric's lecture. And he has done a great job in hosting it as well.
He is less a nuisance to the lecture, but more of professional handling a professional event. When
he comments on something Eric presented, it all has sense and direct to the point. He has a good mix
of humor and no nonsense in his traits as a host. He even makes sure that not one second is wasted.
On instances that the microphone was passed around, he would ask Eric a question to fill the time.
This I greatly appreciate in him as a host. I pray that he will be the host for every lecture that
comes out in Penguin Magic, because he adds direction, urgency, and organization to a lecture.
What I didn't like about his hosting was during the interview section. He has the tendency to
talk for the interviewee about him rather than let the interviewee explain it himself. There are
several times in the lecture that Dan would explain a funny story about Eric, and I was like, why is
he telling that? It would be better for Eric to recount that story to us himself. Then another issue
was at some moments, he would overlap Eric's answer to one of his questions. What I mean by this is
that when Eric would answer a question, Dan would talk at the same time as him. This is not only
distracting to the viewers but also quite annoying that we could not get to listen to his full
answer. His tendency to interrupt was present in this lecture.
But aside from these minor
tendencies, and flaws, this was one of the greatest and well worth lectures in Penguin Magic.
Because of the quality, organization, and relevance of this lecture, I am considering purchasing
another one very soon. I don't care if you are a coin man, card guy or a generalist. There is
something in this lecture you can always find helpful. Inspiration and enlightenment can be found in
each relevant frame.