Sam sent me a review copy of these notes several weeks ago but I've finally had a moment to put
together my thoughts on them...
I'm a firm believer that I can glean inspiration from
everywhere but I'll be honest, I struggled to find anything which would lead me to recommend these
notes to fellow mentalists...
"The Watcher": I've read it several times and I just can't
understand the sequence of events or make sense of the handling... I'm not certain when the p**k is
supposed to take place and don't see how this improves on Bev's watch force.
"The Petal":
This is one of the more workable techniques shared. It's "cute" but I don't often find myself in a
performance venue where there are flowers that it would be appropriate for me to destroy...but I can
see this working while simply out and about in an impromptu setting.
"Extinguish": The ad
copy mentions that this "has never been seen before" but that simply isn't true - Peter Turner's
"Get Busy Living or Get Busy Dying" from BIGGER FISH ONE immediately comes to mind where he uses the
same strategy (and I imagine it's been used elsewhere).
"ISMIP": I view this as a seed of
an idea - I like the general concept but I'm not confident that Sam has worked with it enough for it
to be as deceptive and useful as he claims it to be (but I can't completely write it off as I've not
attempted it in the real world).
"Purple One Handed Center Tear": Okay...so this is likely
the one I have the biggest issue with...this simply doesn't seem convincing AT ALL. The participant
simply couldn't ignore the fact the paper is pre-torn in such a significant manner... IMHO this is
the epitome of tinkering that leads to unuseable and unnecessary "improvements". There's probably a
reason that this is a "new" method...but novel doesn't always mean BETTER.
"Dreaming of
Her": I'm not sure what Sam is really offering here... The ad copy says, "A book test dealing with
dreams" - and that is absolutely accurate but that's about it... the idea is as straightforward as
doing a classic book test using a book about dreams... I don't see any advancement here... Sam also
mentions his "Page Turner" force. I use the classic number force enough to know not to rely on it as
an integral part of the method so this just simply seems unreliable to me, sorry. It would make more
sense to me if you r***le forced a page and then had a deceptive pumping sequence to determine any
dream from the next ten pages - that way you can simply instruct the participant to flip forward a
few pages if they wish but not to tell you where they finally stop.
"Limitless": This
seems a bit too transparent for my tastes and I also can't imagine a situation or context in which
I'd need to force this particular word.
"Falling": This is okay - but again, it seems a
bit transparent and there's already many stronger routines dealing with predicting such things out
there in the community.
"McKenzie's Petal": The core idea is decent but Sam has not
addressed the PRIMARY issue with DR effects - how to clean up the participants reality of the
experience so she too can experience an effect.
"Simon's Petal": I can appreciate the
thought that went into developing this - but it seems like quite the convoluted process to determine
in which hand someone is hiding an object. Also, the explanation doesn't really help the reader
understand how Sam actually applies the concept to the intended routine...
"For Whom":
Again, not really sure what new this brings to the table... half of the method is a Psychological
Force that I use to "pepper up" a routine (referenced above in regards to "Dreaming of Her") but I
won't rely on it as much as this routine requires. The other half of the method is simply a
presentational idea to apply one of mentalisms "mainstay" tools. And if you're going to use this
tool anyway why is the Psychological Force needed at all - simply leverage the tool for both pieces
of information.
I'm really sorry Sam if this review is difficult to read... I wish I could
have gotten these thoughts to you prior to you releasing the notes so that you might have
reconsidered its contents... I'm not one that enjoys being the bearer of such bad news but I really
don't see much value in these notes (certainly not $20 worth!). I respect your enthusiasm and
bravery in stepping out and wanting to share your ideas with the community but I don't think these
notes represent your best effort... I respect the art and my fellow practioners too much not to tell
it like it is and save them the time and money.
Best,
Drew