The description of this trick is bogus. It claims "NO equivoque!" but the whole thing is one big
equivoque. The claim is, the spectator calls a number between 1-52, which matches your written
prediction, 100# of the time. Except, that's a lie. Don't trust the performance video. It works that
smoothly (without equivoque) literally 10% of the time. The other 90% of the time, it's all
equivoque. The instruction video is a sloppy mess. He makes mistake after mistake and never bothers
to correct himself. It includes no written cheat sheet for the complicated equivoque system, you
have to write it out yourself. At one point he counts wrong, doesn't know his own trick well enough
to notice. You can't return a magic trick, which Shin Lim exploits. I salute his skill, but the
description of Think is just phony baloney.
6 of 6 magicians found this helpful.
YOU HAVE TO MEMBER A CHART NOT EASY ,FOR THIS KIND OF MONEY WAY TO MUCH SHOULD BE TEN DOLLARS THE
MOST ,TO LEARN A MEMBER A CHART YOU HAVE TO COPY OFF WEB.I WONT BE DOING THIS ONE.
This effect alone is very strong if presented by a skilled performer.
I took it upon myself to
combine it with another routine and found them to not be compatible at times until I solved the
issue.
Now I have a killer routine that is a reputation maker.
Absolutely destroys.
Routining is the key to professional performances.
A similar "any" card at any number effect which is done clean.
It is a genuinely intelligent handoff card trick, the method enlighten me as to how an ACAAN effect
can be done.
A great had-off card trick to be done close-up.