I was very excited for this trick, as I do a lot of mentalism effects. However, while it states that
it can be used for close-up, spectators also will "lose their ability to read" if they are close.
It's a shoddy gimmick, and I've had children see through it, it's so transluscent. Chris Philpott
basically sits in front of the camera the entire time explaining the effects in little detail, and
it's hypothetical best case scenario at that. Nowhere in the description does this tell you that the
effects have a risk factor. Only one of these effects are reliable, "Sixth Scent", and even then,
you'd have to be a stage performer to do it. I am very displeased with this, an optical illusion
that should be sold at Toys R Us for $10, not worth $80 at all. It is sitting at the bottom of my
shelf in a box and I am debating setting it on fire.
Thank you for your honest review. I truly laughed out loud about potentially setting it on fire. That sentence alone sealed the deal, I will not be purchasing this trick, unless I need some expensive firewood!
If you still have it, I'll buy it off of you.
If you still have it, I'll buy it off of you.
He set it on fire already dave.
Hey Anonymous,
Sorry you had trouble with this. I can assure you it does work reliably if done properly and is very powerful. Lior Manor calls it “the best trick” and performs it in every one of his shows. A famous British mentalist with the initials DB (he doesn’t want people to be able to google his methods) did it every night in his last show and on his last TV special. When David and Leeman did it on America’s Got Talent they got a standing ovation and the youtube version got over 12 million hits. It has been translated into 12 languages and performed thousands if not millions of times all over the world – Cyril did it on a recent Japanese TV special. The 100th Monkey has gotten raves from the best mentalists in the world: Banachek called it “absolutely brilliant” and Richard Osterlind said “Chris Philpott created a whole new area of mentalism with the 100th Monkey,” Colin McLeod called it “utterly baffling” and Max Maven said, “You’re going to want to run with these simian secrets.”
For the effect to work reliably you have to check the light in your performance space before you doing the effect. You can get ready for most performance spaces by printing up more than one set of cards – when we did it on AGT, we brought three, printed in different light levels and slightly different sizes (larger cards makes it easier to see the close up word and so they can be done in dimmer environments). We spent 5 minutes in rehearsal eyeballing it and talking to the director and DP to make sure everything would work perfectly – and it did.
The only other way it can fail is if you’re volunteer has poor eyesight. You can eliminate this possibility by 1) choosing younger volunteers, 2) saying this effect involves reading so you need a person who doesn’t need reading glasses, and/or 3) testing the person’s eyesight with my “Secret Vision Test” which I included as an update. Another strategy is to actively seek someone with bad vision so you can pair them up with someone with good vision – then they can stand side by side and see two completely different things – this makes the effect even stronger!
There are more details on this in the updates and on the Expanded version.
I hope you’ll revisit the effect – if you have questions, I’m not hard to reach. Thanks!
-Chris
I will note that in your spirited, name-dropping defense, that you did not actually address most of the issues raised by this and other reviewers; namely, the risk-factor, the lack of flagging the effect as a stage-only effect, lack of live performances(!), high cost for an optical illusion, the transparency of the method that has several reviewers citing 50/50 results, at best. Also, though you may have brought in several sheets for different lighting situations to prepare for AGT you did not address that this is highly impractical for most performer's situations. I was interested in purchasing the effect but given the negative reviews and your failure in countering them at least to my satisfaction, I think I'll pass.
Add a comment
